Phrasal Words
Compound Word Relationships:
Similar relationships to syntax
exist in compounds, such as the verb object relationship in "hair
restorer."
Compound word structure may
differ from sentence structure, evident in word order.
Complex Objects and Phrasal Words:
Some complex objects function as
words with a clause or phrase as internal structure, termed "phrasal
words" by Carstairs McCarthy (2002).
These phrasal words, like "jack-in-the-boxes,"
behave like words despite their structural phrase nature.
Noun Phrases as Phrasal Words:
Noun phrases like "dyed-in-the-wool"
function as phrasal words.
Unique pluralization, such as
"jack-in-the-boxes," adds complexity, unlike typical noun phrases.
Plurals of these phrasal words
are formed by adding the suffix to the entire expression rather than just the
head noun.
Adjectival Phrasal Words:
Examples of adjectival phrasal
words include "dyed-in-the-wool" and "couldn't care less."
"Dyed-in-the-wool"
structurally resembles an adjective phrase but behaves like a word.
"Couldn't care less"
has a verb phrase structure but functions as an adjective.
Their behavior differs from
typical syntactic structures, emphasizing their status as phrasal words.
Lexical Terms and Plurals:
Terms like governor general,
attorney general, court-martial, and lord lieutenant represent a class of
lexical terms.
Pluralization, like
"attorneys general," showcases their uniqueness.
Structurally odd, these terms
might be considered endocentric words with heads on the left.
The choice of plural form
("attorneys general" vs. "attorney generals") reflects
their lexicalized phrase nature.
Structural Oddities:
The structure of these terms is
peculiar, leading to potential challenges in determining their correct plural
forms.
The distinction between types of
plurals emphasizes their lexicalized phrase nature, making them unique in the
English language.
In essence, phrasal words are a
linguistic phenomenon where the structure may deviate from conventional
syntactic patterns, showcasing the richness and complexity of language.
0 Comments